Dating the oldest new testament manuscripts sedating children for mri
are “scraps,” containing “just a few lines.” This is not accurate.P52, albeit fragmentary, has been thought to be the oldest mss of the NT; however, that changed up until just several years ago with the discovery of a fragment from the gospel of Mark, which was found in an Egyptian funerary mask.Before the discovery of this fragment, the oldest manuscript that had Mark in it was P45, from the early third century (c. This new fragment would predate that by 100 to 150 years.How do these manuscripts change what we believe the original New Testament to say?from the Ostrogoths by the Byzantine Empire, after a war which began in 535 and ended decisively in 553.
Additionally, p46 is from the end of the 2nd c./early 3rd c.it should make you really question the extent of that education.Especially when they go back and edit their response, and still have the information wrong. These new papyri will no doubt continue that trend.
But, if this Mark fragment is confirmed as from the first century, what a thrill it will be to have a manuscript that is dated within the lifetime of many of the original followers of Jesus!
Wallace On 1 February 2012, I debated Bart Ehrman at UNC Chapel Hill on whether we have the wording of the original New Testament today.